A Google Killer?
I came across an article on CNN.com titled "Ex-Googlers launch rival search engine." After reading it, I wondered, "is this a Google killer?"
The company is backed by $33 million in venture capital. They claim that they are indexing more than 120 billion web pages which is greater than Google’s 8.2 million (even though Google doesn’t publish how many they scan). Anyways, enough of the marketing muscle. I wanted to give it a try.
I did some comparative search results between Google and Cuil. I found that Google blows cuil away; however, your comparisons may differ.
Some examples:
I searched for an Oracle 600 error. Google found information, Cuil said no results found.
I decided something basic, so I searched for ".NET". Google brought up a list of results for Microsoft. Cuil said, results not found.
So I did a search of "cuil" on Cuil and guess what? It’s not self-aware! It can’t even find itself, so what makes me think it is capable of finding what I am searching for? This is not even a Google Killer. It’s a Cuil killer. It’s pretty bad when it kills itself.
So I tried a simple search. I searched for trees. BINGO! Cuil has plenty of information about trees. The problem with cuil is I can’t really use it, at least not yet. It has a long way to go to catch up with even Microsoft Live Search, much less, Google.
They spent $33 Million to build this? Alta-Vista was better back in the day. The thing with Google, is it was working well before I ever heard of it. It spread via word-of-mouth, and it is synonymous with web search. Cuil would have been better off waiting until the search technology was well refined.
Have you tried Cuil.com? What do you think?
Inquiring mind(s) want to know : )